This was a fresco of the synthetic event yesterday in Catania. I am also took to the streets to demonstrate, with the students in my Faculty (Architecture). Last night I saw
Annozero Michele Santoro, I followed the debates among students of the movement (or, as he calls someone, the Wave) and the so-called silent majority (the students who have continued to study, despite the protests) and before going to bed I thought su una questione.
Conosco bene (da vecchio studente) le dinamiche sociali delle università e posso, senza indugi, individuare la Maggioranza Silenziosa. E' formata, in gran parte da chi non ha mai preso una posizione, da chi ha la preoccupazione di perdere ore di lezione, da chi è "rigidamente" schierato con la maggioranza di governo e, naturalmente, da chi se ne fotte.
L'Onda è invece formata da chi "rigidamente" schierato con l'Opposizione e da chi sostiene la gravità di una politica che chiude i rubinetti dell'istruzione e della ricerca, a tappeto. Sta di fatto che questi ultimi annoverino tra le loro file anche elettori di questo Governo. E questo è il punto di partenza. Quando in TV ascoltiamo le interviste a Youth Alliance for Higher Education or Youth Force (the silent majority), we should consider that it is as if we were listening to the words of Tremonti or Gasparri. I mean that these statements are not text, because the product of "poor" servants of the party, student-politicians that replicate the arguments of the PDL in defense of Finance and Decree Gelmini. And when you claim to be the spokesperson for a majority that wants to continue to study and talk together, proactively, with the government, is not it, first because it would be like a dialogue with his own reflection, and, secondly, because self-proclaimed spokesman for a "large" group that contains not forget, even a large number of inept.
When we interviewed the members of the Wave, initially in the same situation described above, just replace a few names: Udu ... Veltroni ... Finocchiaro ... and the result is the almost similar. But alongside these, which are a minority, are students, teachers, job (teaching and non teaching staff), which, regardless of the vote at the polls, take to the streets to report an emergency. The event is not only contested, but a cry of alarm of those who see their present and future, already precarious, inevitably collapse.
This is real people, honest and non-violent.
To the right of government, the latter (in good faith), are manipulated by the left post sessantottino from bad teachers (also post sessantottino), and the barons of the University (only defending their privileges.)
That's right this is the beginning of the strategy of government.
The difference between the first and second republic lies in the fact that in the first, irregularities and flaws were hidden and covered up the investigations, until they came to the surface, in the second, many things are done in broad daylight, but are camouflaged. It 's a technique invented by Berlusconi to make a law (to legalize the flaws) and touted as a remedy for a disease that afflicts the system for years (and that has nothing to do with the law, but seems to recall contents). The reasons given for the decree and the budget are indisputable: we live in a time of economic crisis and we realize more each day, then the state needs to take this money from somewhere. Moreover, in recent years, policies of decentralization have increased the number of degree courses, leading to the proliferation of hundreds of detachments, with a considerable amount of state funds. Then if you go to look good through the shelves of research, you will find research projects ridiculous (but which have been funded as much as the others). Finally, the university system sucks, because the territory pertaining to old barons who hold the power directly or subsidiary (in the strict sense of the subsidiary).
The problem is that the State, which should make a strict control on the research being funded, to reduce waste, which could buffer the deficit by cutting funds for the war industry (for example), avoiding the so-called missions of "peace "by investing in research and regulating the working time (two great resources), he decided instead to cut funds to ordinary universities, then pulling the ball in the history of the" barons ", which also grabs the decree, not even smear.
But then we're talking about?
of lies. Taking of gigantic proportions and absolutely serious, because without the skin of the people, the honest, claiming the right to the streets to a life of dignity.
This is a movement. Non-violent, made up of information rather than slogans, passion and above all, despair.
not pull too far.
0 comments:
Post a Comment